Potassium, magnesium, and fruit and vegetable intakes
are associated with greater bone mineral density in elderly men and women1,2,3
Katherine L Tucker,
Marian T Hannan, Honglei Chen, L Adrienne Cupples, Peter WF Wilson and Douglas P Kiel
Background: Osteoporosis and related fractures will be
growing public health problems as the population ages. It is therefore of great importance to identify
modifiable risk factors.
Objective: We investigated associations between dietary components
contributing to an alkaline environment (dietary potassium, magnesium, and fruit and vegetables) and bone
mineral density (BMD) in elderly subjects.
Design: Dietary intake measures were associated with both
cross-sectional (baseline) and 4-y longitudinal change in BMD among surviving members of the original
cohort of the Framingham Heart Study. Dietary and supplement intakes were assessed by food-frequency questionnaire,
and BMD was measured at 3 hip sites and 1 forearm site.
Results: Greater potassium intake was significantly associated
with greater BMD at all 4 sites for men and at 3 sites for women (P < 0.05). Magnesium intake was
associated with greater BMD at one hip site for both men and women and in the forearm for men. Fruit
and vegetable intake was associated with BMD at 3 sites for men and 2 for women. Greater intakes of potassium
and magnesium were also each associated with less decline in BMD at 2 hip sites, and greater fruit and vegetable
intake was associated with less decline at 1 hip site, in men. There were no significant associations
between baseline diet and subsequent bone loss in women.
Conclusion: These results support the hypothesis that alkaline-producing
dietary components, specifically, potassium, magnesium, and fruit and vegetables, contribute to maintenance
of BMD.
Key Words: Bone mineral density • dietary intake • magnesium
• potassium • fruit • vegetables • elderly • osteoporosis • food-frequency questionnaire
Osteoporosis and related fractures are major public health problems
that are growing in importance as the population ages (1). It has been estimated that the lifetime risk of fracture exceeds
40% for women and 13% for men (2). In the elderly, hip fractures are associated with mortality
in up to 20% of cases, with costly long-term nursing home care required for most survivors (3). Reported risk factors for osteoporosis include low physical
activity (4), smoking (5, 6), alcoholism (7), and lack of estrogen in postmenopausal women (8). High body weight and moderate alcohol use appear to protect
against osteoporosis (9, 10), although weight gain and alcohol consumption are
not recommended as interventions because of other potential health risks associated with them.
Nutritional factors are of particular importance to bone health
because they are modifiable. It is generally agreed that calcium and vitamin D are important nutrients for
bone health, and supplements containing these nutrients are prescribed widely (11, 12). Much less is known about the effect of other nutrients on
bone, although effects have been hypothesized for protein, phosphorus, vitamin C, and vitamin K (13). In 1968 Wachman and Bernstein (14) hypothesized that bone mineral functions as a buffer base and
that lifetime buffering of the acid load from the ingestion of mixed diets leads to gradual and accumulated
bone loss. They suggested that "The therapy of osteoporosis may lie in its prevention...it might be
worthwhile to consider decreasing the rate of bone attrition by the use of a diet favouring `alkaline ash.' This
type of diet would emphasize the ingestion of fruits, vegetables, vegetable protein, and moderate amounts
of milk." Two nutrients that may have such buffering effects are potassium and magnesium, which are
found in a variety of whole, unrefined foods, including fruit and vegetables (15, 16). Diets high in fruit and vegetables produce a more alkaline
urine by contributing a variety of compounds that accept hydrogen ions during their metabolism (14, 16).
Although there is both theoretical and some clinical evidence of
an association, relatively few studies have examined the effects of either potassium or magnesium intake on bone.
Low potassium intake has been shown to increase rates of calcium excretion (17). A 2-y controlled trial of magnesium supplementation in osteoporotic
women resulted in slower bone loss and fewer fractures in supplemented women than in unsupplemented women
(18). Only a few population-based studies have reported associations between
dietary intake of potassium, magnesium, or fruit and vegetables and bone status in women (19–22) or elderly men (23). The few studies that examined the associations of both of
these minerals with bone saw similar patterns with each (20, 23). In this study, we investigate both cross-sectional and
longitudinal relations between potassium, magnesium, and fruit and vegetable intakes and bone mineral density (BMD)
in elderly men and women in the Framingham Heart Study. To our knowledge, this is the first study to
relate usual intake of these nutrients and foods to BMD and to change in BMD over time in older men.
Subjects The Framingham Heart Study is a longitudinal cohort
study that was initiated in 1948 to examine risk factors for heart disease. The original subjects were
selected to constitute a two-thirds random sample of the households in Framingham, MA. At baseline,
5209 men and women were examined. Subjects have returned biennially to complete a battery of questionnaires,
examinations, and other testing (24). At the 20th examination (1988–1989), more than
half of the original cohort had died, leaving 1402 surviving subjects. Of these remaining subjects, measurements
of BMD were available for 1164 (448 men and 716 women). Most of the subjects for whom no BMD measures
were available were homebound and unable to have bone density assessments in the clinic. Of those with available
bone measures, 345 men and 562 women also had completed food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs). These subjects (aged
69–97 y at the time of the first bone measurement) were included in the cross-sectional analyses.
Bone density measures were repeated during the 22nd examination (1992–1993) on 229 of the men and
399 of the women; these subjects were included in the analyses of baseline diet and change in BMD. Our study was
approved by the Institutional Review Board responsible for protecting the rights of human subjects at
Boston University Medical
Center and at the Hebrew
Rehabilitation Center for the
Aged. Written, informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Comparison of subjects with and without complete baseline data on
bone and dietary intake revealed no significant differences in sex, education level, smoking status, or body mass
index (BMI; in kg/m2). Subjects with complete data were younger ( : 75.2 y compared with 79.1 y; P = 0.0001) and more
physically active [physical activity score of 33.5 compared with 31.3 (see "Measurement of confounders"
section); P = 0.0001] than those without bone measures or complete FFQs. Subjects with complete data
for analysis of change in BMD tended to be younger and female, with somewhat greater baseline BMDs; for example,
trochanter BMD among women with complete data was greater than among women without follow-up measures
(0.63 compared with 0.59 g/cm2; P = 0.002).
BMD measurements The Framingham Osteoporosis Study began with bone
measurements of participants at the 20th examination. At this examination, BMD measures of the trochanter,
femoral neck, and Ward's area were taken by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA). DPA measurements were
made with a dual-photon scanner (Lunar Radiation Corp, Madison,
WI). The CVs for repeated measurements over 2 y in young, healthy
individuals with this method were 2.65% for the femoral neck, 2.8% for the trochanter, and 4.16% for Ward's
area (25). At the 22nd examination, BMDs were measured in the femoral
neck by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). These had a precision (CV) of 2%, similar to the range of 1.8–1.9%
reported by others (26, 27). To correct for measurement differences between the 2 machines
(DPA and DXA), we used equations derived by scanning a group of subjects with both machines (28).
At both the 20th and the 22nd examination, BMD was also measured
in the forearm (shaft of the radius) by using an SP2 single-photon absorptiometer (Lunar Radiation Corp).
In all cases, the right arm was measured unless there was a history of previous fracture. The precision
was 2% at the radius, similar to other published reports (29). Further details of these measurements were published previously
(25). In the few cases in which different sides were measured
at different times, subjects were deleted from analyses of change in BMD (n = 17 for hip and 16 for radius).
Dietary intake Usual dietary intake for the previous year was assessed
at the 20th examination with a semiquantitative 126-item FFQ (30, 31). Questionnaires were mailed to the subjects and
subjects were asked to bring the completed questionnaires to the examination. Questionnaires on which
energy intakes <2.51 or >16.74 MJ (600 or 4000 kcal)/d were reported or with >12 food items left
blank were considered invalid and excluded from further analysis. Information about use of vitamin and mineral
supplements and specific type of breakfast cereal most frequently consumed was used to estimate total
micronutrient intakes. Reported intake frequency of individual fruit and vegetable items was summed to
obtain the average number of fruit and vegetables consumed per day for each person.
This FFQ has been validated for many nutrients and in several populations
against multiple diet records and blood measures (30–33). Correlations between estimates from the questionnaire and
multiple diet records have been reported to be 0.64–0.73 for potassium intake (30, 32–34) and 0.67–0.71 for magnesium intake (30). There is some evidence that this FFQ underestimates energy
intake (35) and that it may overestimate intake of fruit and vegetables
(36). However, our own comparison of fruit and vegetable intakes
with plasma folate and homocysteine concentrations with this questionnaire in this population supports the
validity of this variable (37).
Measurement of confounders Factors reported to affect BMD include
body weight or BMI, physical activity (38), alcohol use (10), smoking (6), estrogen use by women (8), dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D, and use of calcium
or vitamin D supplements (12, 39). BMI was calculated from measurements of height at the first
examination (1948–1950)—before height may have been lost as a result of osteoporosis—and
weight measured at the 20th examination. Physical activity was measured at the 20th examination with the
Framingham physical activity index, which asked
about the number of hours spent in heavy, moderate, light, or sedentary activity and the number of hours
spent sleeping during a typical day. Each component of these 24-h summaries was then multiplied by an appropriate
weighting factor based on estimated associated energy expenditure and summed to arrive at a physical activity
score (40). The maximum score possible was 63.2 (note that
this score would be unrealistic to obtain because it reflects high-intensity activity for 24 h).
On the questionnaire administered at the 20th examination, subjects
were also asked to quantify their weekly intake of liquor, wine, and beer. From this information, total grams
of alcohol consumed per week was estimated. Based on 13.2 g alcohol per drink, a variable was created
by which subjects were classified as nondrinkers, moderate drinkers (based on the current recommendations for
moderate intake: up to 1 drink/d for women and 2 drinks/d for men), or heavy drinkers (if intakes were greater
than these cutoffs). Subjects were also classified as current smokers, former smokers, or nonsmokers
on the basis of questionnaire responses. Dietary calcium and vitamin D intakes were assessed from the
food-based section of the FFQ. Use of calcium or vitamin D supplements, as recorded on the supplement section of
the FFQ, were coded as dummy (yes or no) variables. For women, estrogen users were defined as those
currently receiving estrogen therapy, with continuous use for 2 y, compared with those who had never received estrogen or were past
users, on the basis of evidence that past use does not sustain bone benefits (8).
Because previous research showed that there are seasonal changes
in BMD in New England, we also created a categorical variable for time of
BMD measurement (12, 41). July, August, and September were coded as summer;
October, November, and December as fall; January, February, and March as winter; and April, May, and June
as spring.
Statistical analyses All statistical analyses were performed with
SAS (version 6.12; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC)
on a VAX mainframe computer (Digital Equipment Corp, Maynard,
MA). For cross-sectional analyses, measures of BMD at the femur and
the radius were regressed on total potassium, magnesium, and fruit and vegetable intakes separately
for men and women, with adjustment for potential confounders in the general linear models procedure. These potential
confounders included age, BMI, physical activity score, smoking status, alcohol use, calcium supplement use,
vitamin D supplement use, season of bone measurement, total energy intake, dietary calcium intake, dietary
vitamin D intake, and, for women, current estrogen use. This list differed slightly for fruit and vegetable
models, in which we included servings per day from other food groups (milk, other dairy, breads and cereals,
and meat, poultry, and fish) in place of dietary calcium and vitamin D. Because most nutrients correlate
with energy intake, adjustment for this variable allows an assessment of the independent effect contributed
by the nutrient. It also allows for differences in intake that may have been due to body size or activity levels
and corrects for some of the measurement error inherent in the FFQ (34).
To better understand the potential collinearity between energy
intake, potassium intake, and magnesium intake, we examined simple and partial (adjusted for age and BMI)
correlations among these 3 variables. Because these analyses showed evidence of high collinearity between
potassium intake and magnesium intake, it was not possible to assess the independent effects of potassium
and magnesium on BMD in the same model. We therefore created a score by summing the standardized z
scores (to adjust for the different scales of the 2 variables) of potassium and magnesium intake and
restandardizing the score. The models described above were rerun, and potassium and magnesium intake variables
were replaced with this combined score. We also tested potassium-by-magnesium and calcium-by-magnesium
interactions.
Change in BMD was defined as BMD at the 22nd examination
minus BMD at the 20th examination. These change measures were regressed on potassium intake, on magnesium
intake, on the potassium plus magnesium z score, and on fruit and vegetable intake for men and
women separately, with all the potential confounders used in the cross-sectional analyses described above, plus
the corresponding baseline measure of BMD at the 20th examination. This baseline BMD measure was included
because of the likelihood that change in BMD may be related to initial BMD. Several models were evaluated,
parallel to those described above for the cross-sectional analysis. For visual presentation, and to assess
the form of the relation, we also created quartile groups for the combined z score and present
adjusted means for changes in bone measures by intake quartile. Statistical differences (P < 0.05) across
quartile groups were tested in the general linear model procedure in SAS, adjusted for the set of confounders
described above, with t test comparisons of least-squares means.
To understand the composition of diets associated with high
potassium or magnesium intakes, the contribution of each of the food items on the FFQ to total potassium
and magnesium intakes was determined and ranked. Intake of magnesium and potassium from supplements
recorded on the FFQ was included in the ranking.
Descriptive statistics Mean values (±SDs) for BMD measures and
for all continuous independent variables and potential confounders used in these analyses are presented
in Table 1 . For categorical variables, percentages in each
category are presented. The average age for both men and women was 75 y. The average BMIs were 27.2 for
men and 26.3 for women. Proportionally more women than men were current smokers, although more men were past smokers.
About 17% of women and 20% of men reported consuming more than the currently recommended maximum of
1 drink/d for women and 2 drinks/d for men. Only 8.7% of men used calcium supplements, compared with
23% of women. More men and women used vitamin D supplements than calcium supplements. Only 5% of women were taking
estrogen at the time of measurement.
Average reported energy
intakes, as calculated from the FFQs, were low for both women and men [6.91 and 7.80 MJ (1653 and 1865
kcal), respectively]. Average magnesium intakes just exceeded the 1989 recommended dietary allowance (RDA) (42), but fell below the recently released RDA of 320 mg/d (43) for women and were far below the new RDA of 420 mg/d for men.
There is no RDA for potassium, but intakes reported here are consistent with other data for US urban
white adults (44). Intakes of magnesium and potassium were mainly
from dietary sources. About 2% of total magnesium consumed by the population came from supplements (1.98%
from multivitamins and 0.18% from magnesium supplements); only 0.04% of potassium intake was from nutrient supplements.
Average reported calcium intakes were also just below the 1989 RDA—and
well below the recently released adequate intake of 1200 mg/d (43). Mean vitamin D intakes were just above the 1989 RDA, but were
much lower than the new adequate intake value of 10–15 µg (400–600 IU)/d for older individuals.
In addition, this variable was highly skewed, with higher intakes achieved through supplementation in a subset
of subjects. Average reported fruit and vegetable intakes were 4.7 fruit or vegetables or both/d for
men and 5.3/d for women, which is somewhat higher than the 3.1–3.4 servings/d reported in national surveys
(45).
Average BMDs ranged from 0.69 g/cm2 for Ward's
area to 0.88 g/cm2 for the femoral neck in men and from 0.51 g/cm2 for the radius
to 0.72 g/cm2 for the femoral neck in women. Over the 4 y of observation, average loss of BMD ranged
from <0 for the trochanter and Ward's area in men to 0.026 ± 0.06 g/cm2 for Ward's area
in women.
Cross-sectional associations between potassium, magnesium, and fruit
and vegetable intakes and bone measures Simple correlations between dietary potassium and dietary magnesium were
0.85 and 0.88 for men and women, respectively, suggesting high collinearity. Adjustment for age, BMI, and energy
intake did not change these correlations. Because of this high collinearity, models containing both
potassium and magnesium tended to not show independent effects of either after the other was controlled for,
although each appeared to be important on its own. None of the nutrient interactions was significant in any of
these models tested. In Tables 2 and 3, therefore, the results are presented of only
the regression of adjusted BMD measures on 1) potassium, 2) magnesium, 3) the potassium plus
magnesium z score variable, and 4) fruit and vegetable intake, for men and women, respectively.
View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Cross-sectional
difference in bone mineral density (BMD) per unit difference in potassium, magnesium, or fruit and vegetable intake in men1
|
|
In men (Table 2 ), the association between potassium and BMD was significant
for all 4 bone sites, with slopes ranging from 0.022 to 0.04 g/cm2, or 5.8% of average BMD for every 1000 mg K. For magnesium intake, results
were significant for the radius and the trochanter and approached significance for the remaining 2 hip
sites. Differences in BMD associated with each 100-mg difference in magnesium intake ranged from 0.023 to 0.027
g/cm2. These represent differences of 3.8% of average BMD. The combined z score, summing
potassium and magnesium intakes, was significant for all 4 bone sites. Fruit and vegetable intake was significant
for all sites except the trochanter. For the femoral neck, the slope of 0.0086 represents a 1% greater BMD
for each fruit or vegetable consumed per day.
In women (Table 3 ), potassium intake was significantly associated with
BMD at 3 sites, with a difference in bone per 1000 mg K of 5.4% of average BMD for the trochanter, 3.4% for Ward's
area, and 3.1% for the radius. Magnesium intake was significantly associated with BMD at the trochanter
and approached significance at Ward's area when all potential confounders were adjusted for. For each
100-mg difference in magnesium intake, there were differences in average BMD of 3.2% and 2.9% for the trochanter
and Ward's area, respectively. The combined z score was also significantly associated with the trochanter
and Ward's area and approached significance for the other 2 sites. Finally, fruit and vegetable intake
was associated with BMD at the radius, the trochanter, and Ward's area.
View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Cross-sectional
difference in bone mineral density (BMD) per unit difference in potassium, magnesium, or fruit and vegetable intake in women1
|
|
Adjusted mean BMDs by
quartile of the potassium plus magnesium z score are presented in Figures 1 and 2 for men and women, respectively. For all bone
measures and for both sexes, BMDs were lowest in those with the lowest intakes of these combined nutrients.
For men, there was a clear dose-response relation with higher BMDs corresponding with higher intake quartiles.
For all sites except the femoral neck, BMD was significantly greater in men in the highest quartile than
in at least one other quartile of potassium plus magnesium intake. Separate figures for potassium and
magnesium (not shown) revealed similar patterns, with somewhat stronger differences across groups seen for
potassium than for magnesium.
View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1. Mean (±SD)
bone mineral density (BMD) at 4 sites by potassium plus magnesium z score quartiles in men. Quartiles 1–4 are
listed from left to right. Bars with different letters are significantly different, P < 0.05. |
|
For women, the group
in the lowest intake quartile had significantly lower BMDs than at least one other quartile group for all hip
sites; however, there were no significant differences in radius BMD across potassium plus magnesium intake
quartiles. Again, separate figures for potassium and magnesium (not shown) followed similar trends.
Because women in the lowest intake quartile consistently had the lowest BMD, whereas BMD in the upper 3 quartiles
did not tend to increase linearly, we also examined the dichotomous difference for magnesium intake by using the
cutoff of two-thirds of the current RDA (43). This analysis (not shown) reconfirmed that women
with low magnesium intakes had significantly lower BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's sites
than did women with intakes above the cutoff (P < 0.05).
Effect of baseline potassium, magnesium, and fruit and vegetable intakes
on subsequent 4-y change in BMD Results for the relation between baseline dietary potassium, magnesium, and
fruit and vegetable intakes and subsequent 4-y change in BMD are presented for men and women in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. In men, greater baseline potassium
intake was significantly associated with lower subsequent 4-y loss of BMD at the femoral neck and trochanter.
Magnesium intake was significantly associated with subsequent change in BMD at the femoral neck and
trochanter, and approached significance at Ward's area. The combined potassium plus magnesium z score appeared
to be the strongest predictor of change in BMD. It was significant for the femoral neck, trochanter,
and Ward's area. Fruit and vegetable intake approached significance at the trochanter and was significant
at Ward's area.
View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Longitudinal
change in bone mineral density (BMD) per unit difference in potassium, magnesium, or fruit and vegetable intake in men1
|
|
Results for change in
BMD in women are presented in Table 5 . In contrast with both the men and with the cross-sectional
results in women, there was no association between baseline diet and longitudinal change in BMD in women.
View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Longitudinal
change in bone mineral density (BMD) per unit difference in potassium, magnesium, or fruit and vegetable intake in women1
|
|
Mean changes in BMD over
the 4-y observation period are presented by combined potassium plus magnesium intake quartiles for men in
Figure 3 . Separate potassium and magnesium figures (not shown)
revealed similar patterns, with significant differences across quartiles for the femoral neck, trochanter,
and Ward's area, but not for the radius. For each of these, being in the lowest intake quartile was
associated with a significantly greater loss of BMD over the 4 y of observation. Mean differences between
the lowest and highest quartile ranged from 0.032 to 0.042 g/cm2 across the 3 hip sites, representing a difference
in BMD loss of 4.0–4.8% of average baseline bone. For women, there were no significant differences
in BMD changes across intake quartiles (not shown).
View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]
|
FIGURE 3. Mean (±SD)
change in bone mineral density (BMD) at 4 sites by potassium plus magnesium z score quartiles in men. Quartiles 1–4
are listed from left to right. Bars with different letters are significantly different, P < 0.05. |
|
Dietary sources of potassium
and magnesium The major food sources of potassium and magnesium are listed in Table 6 . Both nutrients are found in a wide range of whole foods
including fruit and vegetables, whole grains, and milk. Top sources of potassium in this population included potatoes,
milk, orange juice, and bananas. Overall, fruit and vegetables contributed more than half of the total potassium
consumed. Magnesium is found in a wide variety of foods, but particularly in those close to their natural,
unrefined state. Important sources of magnesium in this population included whole-grain bread, milk,
breakfast cereal, bananas, and orange juice. Thus, although not identical in ranking, there were strong similarities
in food sources for potassium and magnesium. It is noteworthy that important sources of calcium and vitamin
D also overlapped with these. Intakes of these 2 nutrients were adjusted for in the analyses discussed
above.
We showed
that there are significant and important associations between intakes of potassium and magnesium and BMD. In men,
significant cross-sectional associations were seen at all BMD measurement sites, but were most consistently
observed for the radius. In women, cross-sectional associations between potassium and magnesium intakes
and BMD were strongest at the trochanter. The strong correlation between potassium and magnesium intakes,
driven by the heavy overlap in dietary sources of these nutrients, made it impossible to separate the effects
of these 2 nutrients on BMD. A combined z score proved to be the most consistently significant
variable associated with BMD cross-sectionally for both men and women, although it usually did not perform much
more strongly than either one of the individual nutrients. Even after we controlled for total energy intake,
which itself is correlated with each of the mineral intakes, the associations appeared to be consistent.
It is likely that the diets reported at baseline represented long-standing dietary patterns for most subjects.
The cross-sectional BMD measures also represented the subjects' accumulated lifetime status. Together, these associations
suggest that long-term diets high in potassium or magnesium or both may protect BMD.
In analyses of 4-y change in BMD, significant results were seen
only in men. Baseline potassium and magnesium intakes, both separately and combined, were predictive of subsequent
4-y bone loss in men, but not women, at all 3 hip sites. These longitudinal associations represent more
time-delimited associations and suggest that a current diet high in these nutrients may protect against
bone loss in elderly men. The lack of predictive association between these nutrients and longitudinal change in
BMD in women, despite a strong cross-sectional association, was not expected and is difficult to explain.
It is possible that the protective effect of magnesium and potassium over years of exposure was seen
in the cross-sectional analyses, but that hormonal factors or other unmeasured interactions in the metabolic environment
of these postmenopausal women at the time of measurement overwhelmed the short-term effects of these nutrients.
Estrogen deficiency has been hypothesized to cause loss of tissue magnesium (46). Further investigation of these differences is
needed.
There are theoretical reasons to expect associations between bone
and each of these nutrients, but there is only limited empirical evidence. Metabolic balance studies have shown
that potassium administration promotes renal calcium retention, whereas low potassium intake increases
daily and fasting urinary calcium excretion rates (17). Dietary potassium may influence bone resorption through these
effects on calcium balance. A study of 18 postmenopausal women showed improved calcium balance, increased serum
osteocalcin concentrations, and decreased urinary hydroxyproline excretion when the women were given
enough potassium bicarbonate to neutralize endogenous acid loads from normal diets (47). The authors concluded that this buffering protects
the skeleton.
Two studies reported cross-sectional associations between potassium
intake and BMD in free-living adult populations (20, 21). Potassium intake, as measured both by an FFQ and by the average
of 4 wk of diet records, was significantly associated with total-body BMD in 213 Swedish women aged
28–74 y (21). A study of 994 premenopausal Scottish women aged 45–49
y also found nearly significant (P < 0.10) associations between potassium intake and BMD at
the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter (20). We have seen no longitudinal reports of potassium and
change in BMD and no studies of this association in men. Our results strongly support a cross-sectional association
between potassium intake and bone in both elderly men and women, and a protective effect against further
bone loss in elderly men.
The role of magnesium in bone metabolism has been reviewed (46, 48). Magnesium contributes macroelement quantities to bone ash and
is essential for appropriate calcium metabolism, affecting calcium balance (46, 49). Cancellous bone in osteoporotic women has been shown to have
a low magnesium content, which is associated with crystals that are more "perfect" and brittle than those
seen in magnesium-replete bone (50, 51). Despite the experimental and circumstantial evidence supporting
the role of magnesium in maintaining bone health and preventing osteoporosis, few studies have evaluated
this relation in humans. Trabecular but not cortical bone was improved with peroral magnesium in a small group
of postmenopausal osteoporotic women (18). In another study, the effects of magnesium given to postmenopausal
women could not be separated from the effects of the simultaneous administration of estrogen (52).
A few population studies have shown low magnesium intake, serum
concentrations, or both in osteoporotic postmenopausal women (19, 53). A recent cross-sectional study of premenopausal women showed
a significant association between magnesium intake and BMD at the lumbar spine (20). An earlier study found a significant positive association
with forearm bone mineral content in premenopausal but not postmenopausal women (22). Additionally, one longitudinal study reported a significant
positive association between magnesium intake and change in total-body BMD in 66 premenopausal women who
were taking calcium supplements and were followed for 1 y (54). Our findings of a significant cross-sectional association
between magnesium intake and hip, but not radius, BMD among postmenopausal women are consistent with these
reports.
The only longitudinal study of change in bone status of postmenopausal
women we could locate included just 33 subjects, with measurement of bone mineral content at the radius and
ulna only (55). As in our study, the authors did not observe a
significant predictive effect of magnesium intake on 4-y change in BMD in these postmenopausal women,
although they did detect a protective association between magnesium intake and bone loss at the humerus in 9 premenopausal
women.
Our results for fruit and vegetable intakes were also interesting,
with significant protective cross-sectional associations in both men and women and suggestive protective
longitudinal effects in men. Fruit and vegetables are important sources of potassium and magnesium and
this finding supports their potential role in the prevention of osteoporosis. We found only one other study
that looked at this association. New et al (20) found significant associations between past reported fruit
intake and BMD at the spine and trochanter in premenopausal women. Although the evidence remains limited,
our findings support the hypothesis put forth by Wachman and Bernstein (14) in 1968 that a diet emphasizing the "ingestion
of fruits, vegetables, vegetable protein, and moderate amounts of milk," all good sources of potassium and
magnesium, may be protective of bone. Further investigation of the suggestion that these nutrients serve
to buffer the acid load of the diet and thereby reduce bone loss is warranted.
View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]
|
FIGURE 2. Mean (±SD)
bone mineral density (BMD) at 4 sites by potassium plus magnesium z score quartiles in women. Quartiles 1–4 are
listed from left to right. Bars with different letters are significantly different, P < 0.05. |
|
1 From the Jean Mayer US Department of Agriculture
Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston; the Hebrew Rehabilitation Center
for the Aged and the Harvard Medical School Division on Aging, Boston; the Boston University School of Public
Health Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's
Framingham Heart Study.
2 Supported in part by USDA ARS contract 53-3K06-01,
by NIH grant R01 AR/AG 41398, and by NIH/NHLBI contract NO1-HC-38038.
3 Address reprint requests to KL Tucker, Jean Mayer
USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, 711 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111.
E-mail: tucker@hnrc.tufts.edu
.
- Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1676–86.[Medline]
- Kanis J, WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture
risk and its applications to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:368–81.[Medline]
- Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O'Dowd KJ.
Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 1985;7:178–208.[Medline]
- Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, Trice I,
Greenburg RA, Evans WJ. Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple factors for osteoporotic fractures: a randomized
controlled trial. JAMA 1994;272:1909–14.[Abstract]
- Seeman E, Melton LJ III, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL.
Risk factors for spinal osteoporosis in men. Am J Med 1983;75:977–83.[Medline]
- Kiel
DP, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Anderson JJ, Baron JA, Felson DT.
The effect of smoking at different life stages on bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:240–8.[Medline]
- Scharpira D. Alcohol abuse and osteoporosis.
Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990;19:371–6.[Medline]
- Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, Wilson PWF, Anderson JJ. The effect of postmenopausal estrogen therapy on bone density
in elderly women. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1141–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Anderson JJ. Effects
of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: the Framingham Study. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:567–73.[Medline]
- Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Kiel DP. Alcohol intake and bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J Epidemiol
1995;142:485–92.[Abstract]
- Dawson-Hughes B, Dallal GE, Krall EA, Sadowski
L, Sahyoun N, Tannenbaum S. A controlled trial of the effect of calcium supplementation on bone density in postmenopausal
women. N Engl J Med 1990;323:878–83.[Abstract]
- Dawson-Hughes B, Dallal GE, Krall E, Harris S,
Sokoll LJ, Falconer G. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on wintertime and overall bone loss in healthy postmenopausal women.
Ann Intern Med 1991;115:505–12.[Medline]
- Heaney RP. Nutritional factors in osteoporosis.
Annu Rev Nutr 1993;13:287–316.[Medline]
- Wachman A, Bernstein DS. Diet and osteoporosis.
Lancet 1968;1:958–9.[Medline]
- Chan JCM. Nutrition and acid-base metabolism.
Fed Proc 1981;40:2423–8.[Medline]
- Remer T, Manz F. Potential renal acid load of
foods and its influence on urine pH. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:791–7.[Medline]
- Lemann J Jr, Pleuss JA, Gray RW. Potassium causes
calcium retention in healthy adults. J Nutr 1993;123:1623–6.[Medline]
- Stendig-Lindberg G, Tepper R, Leichter I. Trabecular
bone density in a two year controlled trial of peroral magnesium in osteoporosis. Magnes Res 1993;6:155–63.[Medline]
- Tranquilli AL, Lucino E, Garzetti GG, Romanini
C. Calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium intakes correlate with bone mineral content in postmenopausal women. Gynecol Endocrinol
1994;8:55–8.[Medline]
- New SA, Bolton-Smith C, Grubb DA, Reid DM. Nutritional
influences on bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:1831–9.[Abstract]
- Michaëlsson K, Holmberg L, Maumin H, Wolk A,
Bergstrom R, Ljunghall S. Diet, bone mass and osteocalcin: a cross-sectional study. Calcif Tissue Int 1995;57:86–93.[Medline]
- Angus RM, Sambrook PN, Pocock NA, Eisman JA.
Dietary intake and bone mineral density. Bone Miner 1988;4:265–77.[Medline]
- Yano K, Heilbrun LK, Wasnich RD, Hankin JH, Vogel
JM. The relationship between diet and bone mineral content of multiple skeletal sites in elderly Japanese-American men and
women living in Hawaii. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:877–88.[Abstract]
- Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FEJ. Epidemiological
approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 1951;41:279–86.
- Hannan MT, Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Bone mineral density in elderly men and women: results from the Framingham Osteoporosis
Study. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:547–53.[Medline]
- Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M, et al. Spine
and femur density using dual-photon absorptiometry in US white women. Bone Miner 1987;2:211–9.[Medline]
- Nilas L, Christiansen C. Rates of bone loss in
normal women: evidence of accelerated trabecular bone loss after the menopausal. Eur J Clin Nutr 1988;18:529–34.
- Kiel
DP, Mercier CA, Dawson-Hughes B, Cali C, Hannan MT, Anderson
JJ. The effects of analytic software and scan analysis technique on the comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry with dual
photon absorptiometry of the hip in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1130–6.[Medline]
- Greenspan SL, Maitland LA, Myers ER, Krasnow MB, Kido TH. Femoral bone loss
progresses with age: a longitudinal study in women over age 65. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1959–65.[Medline]
- Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Colditz
GA, Litin LB, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire
among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:1114–26.[Abstract]
- Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. Reproducibility
and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1985;122:51–65.[Abstract]
- Ascherio A, Stampfer MJ, Coldtiz GA, Rimm EB,
Litin L, Willett WC. Correlation of vitamin A and E intake with plasma concentrations of carotenoids and tocopherols among
American men and women. J Nutr 1992;122:1792–801.[Medline]
- Jacques PF, Sulsky SI, Sadowski JA, Philips JC,
Rush D, Willett WC. Comparison of micronutrient intake measured by a dietary questionnaire and biochemical indicators of micronutrient
status. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;57:182–9.[Abstract]
- Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake:
implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:17–27.[Abstract]
- Sawaya AL, Tucker K, Tsay R, et al. Evaluation
of four methods for determining energy intake in young and older women: comparison with doubly labeled water measurements
of total energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:491–9.[Abstract]
- Feskanich D, Rimm E, Giovannucci EL, et al. Reproducibility
and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc 1993;93:790–6.[Medline]
- Tucker KL, Selhub J, Wilson PWF, Rosenberg IH. Dietary intake pattern relates to plasma folate and homocysteine
concentration in the Framingham Heart Study. J Nutr 1996;126:3025–31.[Medline]
- Greendale GA, Barrett-Connor E, Edelstein S,
Ingles S, Haile R. Lifetime leisure exercise and osteoporosis: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:951–9.[Abstract]
- Dawson-Hughes B. Calcium supplementation and
bone loss: a review of controlled clinical trials. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54(suppl):274S–80S.[Abstract]
- Kannel WB, Sorlie PD. Some health benefits of
physical activity: the Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med 1979;139:857–61.[Medline]
- Krall EA, Sahyoun N, Tannenbaum S, Dallal GE,
Dawson-Hughes B. Effect of vitamin D intake on seasonal variations in parathyroid hormone secretion in postmenopausal women.
N Engl J Med 1989;321:1777–83.[Abstract]
- National Research Council. Recommended dietary
allowances. 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.
- Standing Committee of the Scientific Evaluation
of Dietary Reference Intake. Dietary reference intakes for calcium, phosphorous, magnesium, vitamin D, and fluoride. Washington, DC: Institute of
Medicine, National
Academy of Science, 1997.
- Khaw KT, Barrett-Connor E. Dietary potassium
and stroke-associated mortality: a 12-year prospective study. N Engl J Med 1987;316:235–40.[Abstract]
- Byers T. Dietary trends in the United States. Relevance to cancer prevention. Cancer 1993;72:1015–8.[Medline]
- Seelig MS. Interrelationship of magnesium and
estrogen in cardiovascular and bone disorders, eclampsia, migraine and premenstrual syndrome. J Am Coll Nutr 1993;12:442–58.[Abstract]
- Sebastian A, Harris ST, Ottaway JH, Todd KM, Morris RC Jr. Improved mineral balance and skeletal metabolism
in postmenopausal women treated with potassium bicarbonate. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1776–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sojka JE, Weaver CM. Magnesium supplementation
and osteoporosis. Nutr Rev 1995;53:71–4.[Medline]
- Kenney MA, McCoy H, Williams L. Effects of magnesium
deficiency on strength, mass and composition of rat femur. Calcif Tissue Int 1994;54:44–9.[Medline]
- Manicourt DH, Orloff S, Brauman J, Schoutens
A. Bone mineral content of the radius: correlations with physicochemical determinations in iliac crest trabecular bone of
normal and osteoporotic subjects. Metabolism 1981;30:57–62.[Medline]
- Cohen L, Kitzes R. Infrared spectrospcopy and
magnesium content of bone mineral in osteoporotic women. Isr J Med Sci 1981;17:1123–5.[Medline]
- Abraham G, Grewal H. A total dietary program
emphasizing magnesium instead of calcium: effect on mineral density of cancellous bone in postmenopausal women on hormone
therapy. J Reprod Med 1990;35:503–7.[Medline]
- Reginster JY, Strause L, Deroisy R, Lecart MP,
Saltman P, Franchimont P. Preliminary report of decreased serum magnesium in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Magnesium 1989;8:106–9.[Medline]
- Houtkooper LB, Ritenbaugh C, Aickin M, et al.
Nutrients, body composition and exercise are related to change in bone mineral density in premenopausal women. J Nutr 1995;125:1229–37.[Medline]
- Freudenheim JL, Johnson NE, Smith EL. Relationships
between usual nutrient intake and bone-mineral content of women 35–65 years of age: longitudinal and cross-sectional
analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1986;44:863–76.[Abstract]
Received for publication June 17, 1998. Accepted for publication September 4,
THIS INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED MEDICAL ADVICE. DO NOT CHANGE YOUR DIET OR
MEDICATION IF YOU ARE ILL, OR WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF YOUR PHYSICIAN.
|